Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

When Common Identities Reduce Between-Group Helping

  • Esther van Leeuwen*
  • , Ali Mashuri
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Emphasizing a common group identity is often suggested as a way to promote between-group helping. But recently, researchers have identified a set of strategic motives for helping other groups, including the desire to present the own group as warm and generous. When the motive for helping is strategic, a salient common identity should reduce the willingness to help another group, because the help no longer communicates a quality of the ingroup (only of the common group). The authors tested this hypothesis in two experiments, in which they assessed beliefs about helping (Study 1) and actual helping through behavioral observation (Study 2). The results fully supported the predictions, demonstrating that a common identity is not a universal tool for the promotion of prosocial behavior. The studies also illustrate the strategic nature of between-group helping, in which acts that appear prosocial on the surface are in fact intended to enhance the ingroup's image.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)259-265
Number of pages7
JournalSocial Psychological and Personality Science
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Meta-stereotypes
  • Outgroup helping
  • Prosocial behavior
  • Strategic motives

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When Common Identities Reduce Between-Group Helping'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this