Abstract
Victims of natural or humanitarian disasters sometimes resist aid offered to them, resulting in slower recovery among victims, and feelings of rejection among aid offerers. We present two studies conducted in Indonesia that investigated motives for spurning offers of humanitarian aid. Both studies showed that beliefs in developed countries’ conspiracies lead participants to see humanitarian aid as guided by strategic rather than prosocial motives. Perceived strategic motives in turn enhanced aid resistance, whereas perceived prosocial motives decreased resistance. Conspiratorial beliefs and aid resistance were positively predicted by national collective narcissism (Study 1) and intergroup conflict (Study 2). Together, these findings show that humanitarian aid resistance arises from the recipients’ beliefs in malignant intentions of the providers.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 280-297 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Group Processes and Intergroup Relations |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2022 |
Keywords
- collective narcissism
- conspiratorial beliefs
- humanitarian aid resistance
- intergroup conflict
- motives for outgroup helping
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The psychological antecedents of resistance to humanitarian aid'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver