Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The pod shattering resistance of soybean lines based on the shattering incidence and severity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The study is aimed at evaluating the pod shattering resistance of F8 soybean lines based on the shattering incidence and shattering severity. The materials consist of fourteen F8 soybean lines and two check cultivars. The pod shattering incidence was examined by using the oven-dry method, meanwhile, the shattering severity was evaluated based on the severity of the pod opening. The pod shattering resistance based on the shattering incidence resulted in five resistant lines (7–10% shattering), seven moderate lines (13–23% shattering), one susceptible line (53% shattering), and one very susceptible line (100% shattering). The pod shattering resistance based on the shattering severity showed that the pod opening on the ventral side differed between the lines and between the shattering degree, and it tends to form sigmoid curves with a different peak position for each shattering degree. The shattering severity of the resistant, moderate, and susceptible lines reached a peak at 60 °C, 50 °C, and 40 °C, respectively. A longer pod length indicated by the length of the dorsal (r = 0.827**) and ventral (r = 0.880**) sides of the pod, a higher total pod weight (0.827**), and a larger seed size (0.794**) will increase the degree of susceptibility to pod shattering. Those characteristics were considered to be the ones that should be used as the selection criteria in the breeding programme for pod shattering resistance in soybeans.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-122
Number of pages12
JournalCzech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding
Volume56
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Glycine max
  • Oven-dry method
  • Shatter-resistant
  • Ventral side

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The pod shattering resistance of soybean lines based on the shattering incidence and severity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this