Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Surgical Site Infection Management following Spinal Instrumentation Surgery: Implant Removal vs. Implant Retention: an Updated Systematical Review

  • Andhika Yudistira*
  • , Syaifullah Asmiragani
  • , Abdul Waris Imran
  • , Muhammad Alwy Sugiarto
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The number of lumbar spine surgery increased in recent years. Spinal instrumentation surgery was an integral component in the treatment of spinal pathologies, which can cause surgical site infection (SSI). Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the leading cause of mortality and morbidity after spinal instrumentation surgery. The management of SSI was implant retention and removal is still unclear. Objective: The objective of this literature is to systematically review the implant removal and retention method for SSI management after spinal instrumentation surgery. Methods: We searched in PubMed and ScienceDirect for cohort and randomized control trial studies in English, published between 2002 and 2022, which had data on patients with spinal instrumentation surgery. The underlying disease, comorbidities, common bacteria, type of infection, the onset of infection, implant removal, and retention percentage and recommendation were analyzed. Bias analysis using Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment. Results: We included 15 studies with a total sample were 2.584 with an average of age 15 to 66 years old. The most common organism detected were S. Aureus, MRSA, and S. Epidermis. The most common surgical procedure indications were degenerative followed by scoliosis. Implant removal and retention rate were 0-100% and 0-90,32% respectively. Implant removal is more frequently used in patients after spinal instrumentation surgery than the implant retention method. Conclusion: Implant retention can be performed in case of SSI is < 3 months after surgery. Implant removal is recommended if the incidence of SSI is > 3 months. Empirical antibiotics therapy is necessary to reduce the possibility of implant removal after debridement. Further studies on the effect of implant removal and retention in patients on infection recurrence, pain, and quality of life of patients are needed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)115-120
Number of pages6
JournalActa Informatica Medica
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • implant
  • removal
  • retention
  • spinal instrumentation surgery
  • SSI

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Surgical Site Infection Management following Spinal Instrumentation Surgery: Implant Removal vs. Implant Retention: an Updated Systematical Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this