Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Soft governance and ethical behavior in public universities: the role of mindfulness and managerial support in internal auditing

  • Made Sudarma
  • , Putu Prima Wulandari*
  • , Nurlita Novianti
  • , Qotrunnada Nafi’ Islami
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study examines how managerial support and mindfulness influence internal auditors’ resilience and reduced audit quality behavior in Indonesian public universities. Survey responses were collected from 126 internal auditors working across multiple state universities. Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, the results show that managerial support decreases reduced audit quality behavior (β = −0.277) and increases resilience (β = 0.380). Mindfulness also lowers reduced audit quality behavior (β = −0.330) and strengthens resilience (β = 0.263). Resilience itself does not significantly predict reduced audit quality behavior, suggesting that personal psychological resources require a supportive organizational environment to translate into ethical action. The model explains 24.8 percent of the variance in reduced audit quality behavior and 30 percent in resilience. Multi-group analysis further shows that the beneficial effects of mindfulness are stronger for line auditors than for supervisors. Overall, the findings highlight how organizational and personal resources can work together as soft governance mechanisms to uphold ethical integrity in complex public university systems.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2606961
JournalCogent Social Sciences
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2026

Keywords

  • audit quality
  • internal auditors
  • managerial support
  • mindfulness
  • public universities
  • Soft governance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Soft governance and ethical behavior in public universities: the role of mindfulness and managerial support in internal auditing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this