TY - GEN
T1 - Process Evaluation for Concept Map Building and Its Experimental Evaluation
AU - Rismanto, Ridwan
AU - Pinandito, Aryo
AU - Andoko, Banni Satria
AU - Hayashi, Yusuke
AU - Hirashima, Tsukasa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Concept map as an assessment tool is widely accepted in the field of education. In this research, assuming the process evaluation of concept map building leads to better evaluation than the product (that is, built concept map) evaluation, we proposed a process evaluation method and conducted an experimental evaluation of the method. The process evaluation method is intended for re-composition type of concept maps, not for general ones. In the re-composition concept map, a learner is provided a set of components of a concept map, that is, links and nodes, and required to recompose a concept map by using the components. The provided components are generated by decomposing the concept map built by an expert as a representation of understanding of the learning target. In this research, we set several submaps with a set of semantics in one expert map and define a good process by recomposing the submap as a series of activities. The process evaluation results were compared with the product evaluation results for the data of a practical use of re-composition of concept map in undergraduate class. As the results of the comparison, we have already confirmed that the result of process evaluation was a better predictor of learner's understanding than the results of the product evaluation. In this paper as an additional analysis, we reported the analysis of relation between process evaluation and product evaluation. The difference between the evaluation methods could result in a case where there is zero score for process evaluation and full score for product evaluation. However, analysis results confirmed that there is a strong correlation between the two evaluation methods with r value = 0.8. These results suggest that support for the process of submap re-composition is a promising way for learners to recompose a good concept map. We further explore the usability of the process evaluation to the teachers, and it shows a high rate of agreement of the usefulness and appropriateness of the method. Based on the results, we are developing a formative assessment and support environment for concept map re-composition.
AB - Concept map as an assessment tool is widely accepted in the field of education. In this research, assuming the process evaluation of concept map building leads to better evaluation than the product (that is, built concept map) evaluation, we proposed a process evaluation method and conducted an experimental evaluation of the method. The process evaluation method is intended for re-composition type of concept maps, not for general ones. In the re-composition concept map, a learner is provided a set of components of a concept map, that is, links and nodes, and required to recompose a concept map by using the components. The provided components are generated by decomposing the concept map built by an expert as a representation of understanding of the learning target. In this research, we set several submaps with a set of semantics in one expert map and define a good process by recomposing the submap as a series of activities. The process evaluation results were compared with the product evaluation results for the data of a practical use of re-composition of concept map in undergraduate class. As the results of the comparison, we have already confirmed that the result of process evaluation was a better predictor of learner's understanding than the results of the product evaluation. In this paper as an additional analysis, we reported the analysis of relation between process evaluation and product evaluation. The difference between the evaluation methods could result in a case where there is zero score for process evaluation and full score for product evaluation. However, analysis results confirmed that there is a strong correlation between the two evaluation methods with r value = 0.8. These results suggest that support for the process of submap re-composition is a promising way for learners to recompose a good concept map. We further explore the usability of the process evaluation to the teachers, and it shows a high rate of agreement of the usefulness and appropriateness of the method. Based on the results, we are developing a formative assessment and support environment for concept map re-composition.
KW - Concept map
KW - concept map assessment
KW - Kit-build
KW - process evaluation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85181532335
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85181532335
T3 - 31st International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2023 - Proceedings
SP - 362
EP - 371
BT - 31st International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2023 - Proceedings
A2 - Shih, Ju-Ling
A2 - Kashihara, Akihiro
A2 - Chen, Weiqin
A2 - Chen, Weiqin
A2 - Ogata, Hiroaki
A2 - Baker, Ryan
A2 - Chang, Ben
A2 - Dianati, Seb
A2 - Madathil, Jayakrishnan
A2 - Yousef, Ahmed Mohamed Fahmy
A2 - Yang, Yuqin
A2 - Zarzour, Hafed
PB - Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education
T2 - 31st International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2023
Y2 - 4 December 2023 through 8 December 2023
ER -