TY - GEN
T1 - Performance Analysis of Paddy Disease Classification Using Multiple YOLO Models
AU - Zhang, Wenjunliang
AU - Asri, Muhammad Amirul Aiman
AU - Mokhtar, Norrima
AU - Kimura, Shunta
AU - Harakawa, Ryosuke
AU - Iwahashi, Masahiro
AU - Rajagopal, Heshalini
AU - Rahmadwati,
AU - Ito, Takao
AU - Sendari, Siti
AU - Laksono, Pringgo Widyo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The 2026 International Conference on Artificial Life and Robotics (ICAROB2026).
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - To support fast field monitoring and practical deployment, we benchmark the classification heads of YOLOv5, YOLOv8, and YOLOv11 in nano and medium variants on New Paddy Doctor, a public rice-disease dataset. From its 10 annotated categories, we select an eight-class leaf subset with 6,627 images covering Bacterial leaf blight (BLB), Bacterial leaf streak (BLS), Rice blast, Brown spot, Downy mildew, Hispa damage, Tungro, and healthy leaves. Using a unified 224×224 training and evaluation protocol, we report Top-1 accuracy, Macro-F1, Weighted-F1, and confusion matrices, and we compare model complexity by parameters and FLOPs. On our test set, YOLOv8-m attains the highest accuracy at about 99.9%, YOLOv11 variants reach about 99.8%, while YOLOv5 achieves about 95%. We also examine the balance between accuracy and computational cost and provide deployment recommendations. The data splits and key configurations are released to facilitate reproducibility.
AB - To support fast field monitoring and practical deployment, we benchmark the classification heads of YOLOv5, YOLOv8, and YOLOv11 in nano and medium variants on New Paddy Doctor, a public rice-disease dataset. From its 10 annotated categories, we select an eight-class leaf subset with 6,627 images covering Bacterial leaf blight (BLB), Bacterial leaf streak (BLS), Rice blast, Brown spot, Downy mildew, Hispa damage, Tungro, and healthy leaves. Using a unified 224×224 training and evaluation protocol, we report Top-1 accuracy, Macro-F1, Weighted-F1, and confusion matrices, and we compare model complexity by parameters and FLOPs. On our test set, YOLOv8-m attains the highest accuracy at about 99.9%, YOLOv11 variants reach about 99.8%, while YOLOv5 achieves about 95%. We also examine the balance between accuracy and computational cost and provide deployment recommendations. The data splits and key configurations are released to facilitate reproducibility.
KW - deploymen
KW - empirical benchmarking
KW - Rice disease classification
KW - YOLO
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105030180465
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105030180465
SN - 9784991462603
T3 - Proceedings of International Conference on Artificial Life and Robotics
SP - 605
EP - 612
BT - Proceeddings of the 2026 International Conference on Artificial Life and Robotics, ICAROB 2026
A2 - Ito, Takao
A2 - Jia, Yingmin
A2 - Lee, Ju-Jang
A2 - Sugisaka, Masanori
PB - ALife Robotics Corporation Ltd
T2 - 31st International Conference on Artificial Life and Robotics, ICAROB 2026
Y2 - 29 January 2026 through 1 February 2026
ER -