TY - GEN
T1 - Experimental Test for Compressive Yield Strength of Cold Form Steel C Profile from X and Y Product
AU - Mudjanarko, S. W.
AU - Bahaswan, R.
AU - Rasidi, Nawir
AU - Zacoeb, Achfas
AU - Jaya, Ramadhansyah Putra
AU - Ibrahim, Mohd Haziman Wan
AU - Arshad, Mohd Fadzil Bin
AU - Wiwoho, Firdaus Pratama
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© IEOM Society International.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Mild steel is one of the components that are often used by the community as a building structure. In this study try analyze how much the flexural strength of the mild steel C profile. This is done because the C Profile of mild steel is easy to work with, easy to obtain on the market and relatively inexpensive. Lightweight steel profile C can be used as a substitute for the roof truss of wood and concrete. The results obtained from the flexural strength of steel C profiles lightness of each test object. High strength mild steel C profile bending strength 7.5 cm, thickness 1 mm from PT. X with a span of 1 m and with one point compressive load produced deflection of 9.7 mm, P max 214 kg and σlt (compressive yield strength) 23.61 kg / mm2 while from PT. Y produced deflection of 9.2 mm, Pmax 210 kg and σlt (compressive yield strength) 21.82 kg / mm2. Thus the best results are generated from the PT. X compared to PT. Y.
AB - Mild steel is one of the components that are often used by the community as a building structure. In this study try analyze how much the flexural strength of the mild steel C profile. This is done because the C Profile of mild steel is easy to work with, easy to obtain on the market and relatively inexpensive. Lightweight steel profile C can be used as a substitute for the roof truss of wood and concrete. The results obtained from the flexural strength of steel C profiles lightness of each test object. High strength mild steel C profile bending strength 7.5 cm, thickness 1 mm from PT. X with a span of 1 m and with one point compressive load produced deflection of 9.7 mm, P max 214 kg and σlt (compressive yield strength) 23.61 kg / mm2 while from PT. Y produced deflection of 9.2 mm, Pmax 210 kg and σlt (compressive yield strength) 21.82 kg / mm2. Thus the best results are generated from the PT. X compared to PT. Y.
KW - C profile
KW - Experimental
KW - Flexural strength
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85126224214
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85126224214
SN - 9781792361272
T3 - Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
SP - 1195
EP - 1196
BT - Proceedings - 4th European Rome Conference 2021
A2 - Fargnoli, Mario
A2 - Lombardi, Mara
A2 - Tronci, Massimo
A2 - Dallasega, Patrick
A2 - Savino, Matteo Mario
A2 - Costantino, Francesco
A2 - Di Gravio, Giulio
A2 - Patriarca, Riccardo
PB - IEOM Society
T2 - 4th European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, IEOM 2021
Y2 - 2 August 2021 through 5 August 2021
ER -