Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Digital skills and self-efficacy: Unpacking their influence on faculty research engagement

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Drawing from social cognitive theory, this study investigates the mediating role of self-efficacy in the relationship between Digital Skills and Research Engagement among faculty in Higher Education. Using a cross-sectional research design, data were collected from 211 faculty members at a Private University in Indonesia. The Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) technique was applied to test the hypotheses proposed in research model. The results indicate that only three dimensions of Digital Skills-Information and Data Literacy, Communication and Collaboration, and Problem-Solving-have a positive and significant effects on Research Engagement. On the other hand, Content Development and Safety show insignificant effects. Additionally, Self-Efficacy have a positive and significant direct effect on Research Engagement and acts as a mediator between Information and Data Literacy, Problem-Solving, and Research Engagement. These results underscore the importance of developing targeted professional development programs that enhance digital skills and self-efficacy, ultimately contributing to improved research productivity and academic success. The study highlights the need for institutions to invest in faculty training and support systems that promote digital literacy and self-efficacy, fostering a more engaged and effective academic workforce.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2032-2047
Number of pages16
JournalEdelweiss Applied Science and Technology
Volume8
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Digital skills
  • Research engagement
  • Self-efficacy
  • Social cognitive theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Digital skills and self-efficacy: Unpacking their influence on faculty research engagement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this