Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Detection of online review spam: A literature review

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

Online reviews have become an important resource for customers. It has become a habit for customers to first read a review before deciding to make a purchase. But it can be used by fraudsters to make review spam. This activity can result in the wrong customer purchase decision. Automatic opinion mining methods can also provide inaccurate conclusions due to this activity. This paper aims to provide a literature review on the online review spam detection topic. We identify papers relevant to related topics since 2015, understanding each paper to extract findings, similarities, and research gaps. We find that studies on this topic can be categorized into three focus groups. Focus on review spam detection methods, studies on individuals who write review spam, and studies that examine the spammer groups. Each focus of research has its strengths and weaknesses method which provide benefits in the field of review spam detection.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of 2020 International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology, SIET 2020
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery
Pages57-63
Number of pages7
ISBN (Electronic)9781450376051
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Nov 2020
Event5th International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology, SIET 2020 - Virtual, Online, Indonesia
Duration: 16 Nov 202017 Nov 2020

Publication series

NameACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Conference

Conference5th International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology, SIET 2020
Country/TerritoryIndonesia
CityVirtual, Online
Period16/11/2017/11/20

Keywords

  • online review
  • spam
  • spammer
  • spammer group

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Detection of online review spam: A literature review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this