Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Consistency and vote buying: Income, education, and attitudes about vote buying in Indonesia

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This article examines ambivalence-The simultaneous holding of two or more conflicting values or beliefs about a political issue-Among Indonesian citizens' attitudes about vote buying. Using an original survey taken during the 2014 Indonesian elections, we analyse the factors related both to citizens' normative views about vote buying and their willingness to accept gifts from candidates. A large number of citizens demonstrate ambivalence by viewing the practice as unjustified or corrupt and yet expressing willingness to accept money from candidates. We also examine the differential effects of education and income on these attitudes. Consistent with "demand side" theories of vote buying, low income creates economic pressure to accept money but does not influence normative attitudes about vote buying. Education, however, has a broader effect by influencing both normative attitudes and willingness to accept money. We consider implications of these results for Indonesian officials focused on reducing vote-buying behavior.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)313-329
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of East Asian Studies
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Ambivalence
  • Indonesian elections
  • Indonesian politics
  • Public opinion
  • Southeast Asia politics
  • Vote buying

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Consistency and vote buying: Income, education, and attitudes about vote buying in Indonesia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this