Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Benefit–cost analysis of a low-impact development design

  • Entin Hidayah*
  • , Wiwik Yunarni Widiarti
  • , Retno Utami Agung Wiyono
  • , Very Dermawan
  • , Dea Fadhilah
  • , Wardah Tahir
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The urban development increase in the built-up areas leads to more impervious areas with the consequence of larger runoff. Undeniably, this excess water has many benefits. Low-impact development (LID) is one of the innovations to conserve wasted runoff water. The two LID scenarios (water storage - WS; infiltration - I) under different rainfall depths (20, 25, 30, 35 mm) are assessed using Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) and analyzed based on their benefit-cost. This study aims to evaluate the hydrological performance and the benefit-cost ratio to identify the optimal LID design. The benefit calculation is not only projected by runoff reduction aspects, but also the other opportunities aspects. Based on the hydrological performance, scenario I shows a higher runoff reduction performance than scenario WS. Based on the benefits aspects studied, scenario I provides greater benefits with more cost than the WS scenario. Rainfall depth influenced the life cycle cost with 20-mm WS scenario experiencing faster payback period than other scenarios.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)502-518
Number of pages17
JournalWater Practice and Technology
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation
    SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
  2. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
    SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities

Keywords

  • Benefit-cost analysis
  • bioretention
  • low-impact development
  • rain barrel
  • urban development
  • vegetative swales

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Benefit–cost analysis of a low-impact development design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this