TY - JOUR
T1 - A Delphi exercise to identify characteristic features of gout - Opinions from patients and physicians, the first stage in developing new classification criteria
AU - Prowse, Rebecca L.
AU - Dalbeth, Nicola
AU - Kavanaugh, Arthur
AU - Adebajo, Adewale O.
AU - Gaffo, Angelo L.
AU - Terkeltaub, Robert
AU - Mandell, Brian F.
AU - Suryana, Bagus P.P.
AU - Goldenstein-Schainberg, Claudia
AU - Diaz-Torne, Cèsar
AU - Khanna, Dinesh
AU - Lioté, Frederic
AU - McCarthy, Geraldine
AU - Kerr, Gail S.
AU - Yamanaka, Hisashi
AU - Janssens, Hein
AU - Baraf, Herbert F.
AU - Chen, Jiunn Horng
AU - Vazquez-Mellado, Janitzia
AU - Harrold, Leslie R.
AU - Stamp, Lisa K.
AU - Van De Laar, Mart A.
AU - Janssen, Matthijs
AU - Doherty, Michael
AU - Boers, Maarten
AU - Edwards, N. Lawrence
AU - Gow, Peter
AU - Chapman, Peter
AU - Khanna, Puja
AU - Helliwell, Philip S.
AU - Grainger, Rebecca
AU - Schumacher, H. Ralph
AU - Neogi, Tuhina
AU - Jansen, Tim L.
AU - Louthrenoo, Worawit
AU - Sivera, Francisca
AU - Taylor, William J.
PY - 2013/4
Y1 - 2013/4
N2 - Objective. To identify a comprehensive list of features that might discriminate between gout and other rheumatic musculoskeletal conditions, to be used subsequently for a case-control study to develop and test new classification criteria for gout. Methods. Two Delphi exercises were conducted using Web-based questionnaires: one with physicians from several countries who had an interest in gout and one with patients from New Zealand who had gout. Physicians rated a list of potentially discriminating features that were identified by literature review and expert opinion, and patients rated a list of features that they generated themselves. Agreement was defined by the RAND/UCLA disagreement index. Results. Forty-four experienced physicians and 9 patients responded to all iterations. For physicians, 71 items were identified by literature review and 15 more were suggested by physicians. The physician survey showed agreement for 26 discriminatory features and 15 as not discriminatory. The patients identified 46 features of gout, for which there was agreement on 25 items as being discriminatory and 7 items as not discriminatory. Conclusion. Patients and physicians agreed upon several key features of gout. Physicians emphasized objective findings, imaging, and patterns of symptoms, whereas patients emphasized severity, functional results, and idiographic perception of symptoms. The Journal of Rheumatology
AB - Objective. To identify a comprehensive list of features that might discriminate between gout and other rheumatic musculoskeletal conditions, to be used subsequently for a case-control study to develop and test new classification criteria for gout. Methods. Two Delphi exercises were conducted using Web-based questionnaires: one with physicians from several countries who had an interest in gout and one with patients from New Zealand who had gout. Physicians rated a list of potentially discriminating features that were identified by literature review and expert opinion, and patients rated a list of features that they generated themselves. Agreement was defined by the RAND/UCLA disagreement index. Results. Forty-four experienced physicians and 9 patients responded to all iterations. For physicians, 71 items were identified by literature review and 15 more were suggested by physicians. The physician survey showed agreement for 26 discriminatory features and 15 as not discriminatory. The patients identified 46 features of gout, for which there was agreement on 25 items as being discriminatory and 7 items as not discriminatory. Conclusion. Patients and physicians agreed upon several key features of gout. Physicians emphasized objective findings, imaging, and patterns of symptoms, whereas patients emphasized severity, functional results, and idiographic perception of symptoms. The Journal of Rheumatology
KW - Classification
KW - Criteria
KW - Gout
KW - Patients
KW - Physicians
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84875864600
U2 - 10.3899/jrheum.121037
DO - 10.3899/jrheum.121037
M3 - Article
C2 - 23418379
AN - SCOPUS:84875864600
SN - 0315-162X
VL - 40
SP - 498
EP - 505
JO - Journal of Rheumatology
JF - Journal of Rheumatology
IS - 4
ER -